:
}
D
87
6.
Upon this advice which I thought it advis-
able to follow, 1 at once returned to the Chief Justice's
Chambers after having knocked at his door and told him, not "in a loud and offensive tone" as he so repeatedly asserts, but
after asking for permission to address him, that i had been
advised before the gentismen who had been present in Chambers
had dispersed, to ask him to apologise to me in their presence
for his false and unjust aspersions upon my character. He re- plied: "I refuse to do so. I must take down in writing what you
say. Please speak more slowly so that I can take a note of your
remarks". I replied "You have insulted me in the presence of these gentlemen, all gentlemen, fortunately for myself, you
have said that everybody in the Colony knew how I performed my
duties now I ask you as a gentleman to apologise. He again
said "1 refuse. i never said everybody in the Colony" - i said
"You did, Sir," and 1 appealed to Mr. Slade who declined to
interfere and 1 then left of my own accord the Chief Justice's
Chambers. I deny that he ever asked me to leave his room.
7.
I am at a loss to understand what Sir
William Goodman wishes to insinuate by his remark that from his
previous experience with myself, that recollection of what had
occurred were apt to differ. Until I am acquainted with the al-
leged incidents referred to, I am unable to go into them. I
have no recollection of them and look upon his mention of this
as an attempt to prejudice and which as he himself must know
is utterly irrelevant to the question at issue, although fully
agreeing with him, as he himself says, that the account attached
to his letter of what actually occurred is rather "involved".
With regard to his contention about my
having committed a contempt of Court, having never referred to
it in Chambers, shewing therefore the drift of his mind now, 1
would
8.
-- "་ན་‘----"" ""
Page 90Page 91
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.